Common mistakes in activity evaluation First of all, keep in mind that there is only one answer to all questions that use evaluation judgment as a Whatsapp Databaseverb: "good or bad . " For example, how to evaluate the activity, you can answer: This activity is very good, and it should be continued. This activity is not Whatsapp Database good and cannot be done. This activity is not bad or not, it's tasteless. Nothing has changed in this activity, and it's nothing to do.
This is the core conclusion of the evaluation class analysis. Leaving these four sentences, everything else is nonsense. for example: During the Whatsapp Database event, 40,000 new people registered. The number of registrations during the event was 10,000 more than before the event. The new user click-through rate during the campaign was 80%. Whatsapp Database During the event, the new user's equity rate is 30%. These are not conclusions, but only the analysis process. If there is no conclusion, just throw these process indicators directly, and it is easy for the business side to ask: "So what? So? What did you analyze? What is the conclusion!" 2.
Key Issues in Activity Evaluation Activity Whatsapp Database evaluation, first of all to get a good / bad evaluation . If the evaluation is good, see if you can continue to do it, and how many times you can do it; if the evaluation is bad, see where the Whatsapp Database difference is, if it is hopelessly bad, you can still save it and continue to use it. Data + Labels = Judgment. So to make a good/bad judgment, you need 2 things: Clarify the assessment indicators. Specify the target value. If it meets the standard, it is considered good; if it does not meet the standard, it is not good. It's that simple (pictured below).