Integrate the brain (of a pig) with a computer, elon device as a fitbit implanted in the brain that will allow activity to be recorded. Brain and send it to an external device for encoding, analysis and interpretation (something far from that superhuman cognition). During the presentation, a sow (gertrude) was shown to have a set of microchips implanted in her brain and the animal's brain activity was recorded live when her nose was stroked. Two other pigs were also shown, one in which the implant had not been performed (control) and the other in which the previously placed implant had been removed.
Thus, it was intended to show that the implantation and removal of the implant had no detrimental effects on the animals. Bearing this in mind, different analysts (and elon musk himself) have suggested that the true objective of e commerce photo editing service the presentation was to recruit researchers, investors and volunteers to be able to develop the project. So far, it seems that neuralink does not bring a revolutionary technology to the table, but rather has brought together various advances that are already taking place in disciplines such as neuroscience and biotechnology around a striking and novel idea. However, what the experts do seem to agree on is that neuralink has achieved a boost in the field thanks to the creation of the
neurosurgical robot and the design improvements that open the door to the implementation of a large number of electrodes permanently in the brain and with a wireless connection to the outside. Where is the ethics in projects like neuralink? In the hypothetical case that the research advances rapidly in the sense proposed by neuralink, it is important to take into account the ethical limitations that this type of advance implies, especially in relation to the "artificial improvement" of the brain as one more service for consumption. Human. To begin with, the current state of knowledge does